On Friday 07 November 2003 15:35, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - 
SPO) wrote:
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > You do not want persistence of avalon components. You need to persist
> > data. Data != component.
> >
> > The component should just be logic, which is already persisted in the
> > form of the classfile. The integral part of the component that is not in
> > its classfile is its configuration (and metadata). Those are already
> > persistent (all those xml files).
>
> I think components are about logic and state. Logic usually alters the
> state of an object. Alexis wants to keep components state durable. I think
> its a common and normal requirement, I just can't agree about the meanings
> :-)

So what is the difference from getting data from configuration file and data 
from the storage (db, ldap or whatever) except that configuration could be 
seen as static final data.



> As Berin already state once, the simplest designs normally are the best
> choices.

ok but that does not mean doing nothing and "waiting for the sun".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to