Niclas Hedhman wrote: <snip/>
IMHO, RDF provides us with exactly the resource description we need.
+1!
However, be weary of making RDF too complex. It is quite easy to make things too flexible using RDF. Also, I strongly believe in the LCD of the basic filesystem. After all, it has worked so far for every packaging mechanism in existence today.
I bet that if you keep LCD-compatibility in your RDF sublanguage, it will remain simple enough.
- LSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
