On Monday 17 November 2003 22:37, Leo Simons wrote:
* Gump.
I think you lost the "little guy", when "�ber b�ilder" came in. At least, I have a very humble opinion about Gump that <-------censored----->
Reminds me of a similar opinion of Maven...
Never mind.
the point is the need for continuous integration. Gump is sort-of ugly yes, but it is a lot less ugly than everything else. Do you think continuous integration is bad and/or not worth the effort?
* CVS.
Advanced CVS?? What are you having in mind? An continously integrated trunk, and a branch for each change, merged back when completed?
Let us call everything other than add|commit|import using a GUI tool 'advanced'. Regular tagging, use of branches for refactoring, stuff like that. We don't need to go mozilla-style :D
Yes, boss ;o)
LOL!
Taking that comment seriously (knowing its not)...the whole point of course is that we want to avoid a hierarchical (or even matrix) structure :D
- LSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
