> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 2:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] IoC type, well, something > > Leo Simons wrote: > > Leo Sutic wrote: > >> ...that all components are what we would call > >> ThreadSafe/Singleton, i.e. you get one reference > > > > actually, the idea at that point was that you may be receiving a proxy > > which implements the lifestyle under the covers...hot swapping is still > > possible even if you keep the reference..... > > I have a love/hate relationship with the picocontainer peeps. Everytime > I think of something, they've just finished implementing it: > > http://www.picocontainer.org/hotswapping.html > > (not intended as yet-another-plug-for-pico, but it does have a nice > picture showing the idea; I'm sure its not actually remotely new :D) > > - LSD
I'm still wavering on how much I like IoC type-2+ schemes. Perhaps it's because I enjoy abusing the ServiceManager so much. One of these days when I finish mulling it all over, I'll write some sort of IoC manifesto. :) J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
