> -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The question I have is can we make a container that doesn't care what the > lifecycle of a component is or not. Can we make a container that can > combine > Type 1, Type 2, and Type Z components all working together?
In my JingDAO project that uses Avalon and Pico, I have support for type 1,2, and 3, though there's a lot of room for improvement. You're right it shouldn't be that hard at all. > That way, if someone prefers the PicoContainer approach, hey we have it > covered. > If someone prefers the NanoContainer or HiveMind approach, well no sweat. > If we prefer the Avalon 4 semantics, most excellent (I have been told that > I > look like Ted in Bill & Ted's Excelent Adventure). Wait, you look like Keanu Reeves? Woah. > The bottom line is that I think the more boundaries we can obliterate the > better. +1 J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
