On Tuesday 18 November 2003 23:14, Ulrich Mayring wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Not having an opinion about his proposal at large (yet), your counter
> > argument is a bit bleak. Ever heard of methods ;o) ?
> >
> > public class Abc
> > {
> > public Abc( Configuration conf, ServiceManager man )
> > throws Exception
> > {
> > configure( conf );
> > service( man );
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Would that be so much different from what you are doing now?
>
> Of course it would. I cannot control the order in which the lifecycle
> stages are called, for example, or even their names.
Control? Reading your later posts, this statement makes we really wonder where
you come from.
Are you saying that you DO want control or that you DO NOT want control?
Are you saying; "Hey I have no clue in which order I should get my component
into operational shape, so please guide in runtime." ?
I am not arguing against Avalon4, just argue against your defense of it, which
makes absolutely no sense to me. :o(|) (Saya Monyet Bodoh!)
Cheers,
Niclas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
