Stephen McConnell wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
given the decreased likelyhood of the Avalon-Meta package being in broad use across different containers, I suggest we stop referring to it as "standard", because its not.
-1
you can't veto a suggestion dude!
But I can type the characters "-1" in response to the suggestion and though that indicate to you what my opinion is concerning the suggestion.
We have a framework specification that defines the computational contract for components (the how), and complimenting this we have a the meta-info specification (the what). Both go hand-in-hand in defining what a component is and what it's expectations are.
It is the standard for defining *what* the component needs in a container neutral way.
Cheers, Stephen.
--
|------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
