On Saturday 17 January 2004 04:32, J Aaron Farr wrote: > My very biased opinion: go with the aggregated view. Avalon is > complicated already. The component view only seems to add to that > complexity. Let's keep it simple.
I agree with your very exhaustive analysis of this. (Thanks). > Finally, I feel it would be easier to start small and grow if > necessary. Most of us are new to JIRA. It will be much easier to break > out issues into new projects than aggregate later. The JIRA people must have been thinking about this before and during development, since IMHO Category = Avalon Product = Cornerstone Component = Cornerstone Datasources Seems to map fairly well with what we have and to make it reasonably manageable. Also, I happen to believe that with a bit better build system, we could easily have Product Releases and sync all the Artifact versions to it, i.e. I change cornerstone-thread-impl, the whole Cornerstone product is released and all JARs in it is updated with the new version number. (I mean we don't have 36 hour build times!) Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
