Stephen McConnell wrote:
3.3 <snip/> walk-in-the-park.

is there a timeline to look at?


exposing a Object get( key ) - I think that instead we should be thinking more along the lines of

   void addServiceAvailabilityListener(
      ServiceAvailabilityListener listener, Something key );

Thoughts?

well, that could work, but my listener would just be maintaining a map internally of available services and still exposing the get() operation. I was thinking of a stateless adapter, which is automatically in sync with current state, without being notified. Easier for my usecase.


why would you want listeners?

cheers,

- LSD



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to