Stephen McConnell wrote:
What do think?

a) MutableConfiguration is IMHO seriously flawed because it exposes a work interface which is not defined using an actual interface;
b) it is straight-forward to extract the work interface from MutableConfiguration and make it an actual interface (any half-decent refactoring tool can do it automatically);
c) MutableConfiguration should not be moved anywhere, for backwards compatibility reasons;
d) the amount of discussion surrounding this rather minor issue is totally out of proportion (example: gump can become a TLP in less time than it takes to just /read/ all the messages related to this thread).


a,b,c,d --> makes me think something like "bleh!!!". It doesn't translate into English well.

I decided to focus only on fun stuff a while back, and this is not fun. In fact, I stopped doing fun stuff in order to type this e-mail. Whoops! Better get back to my corner.

--
cheers,

- Leo Simons

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weblog              -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
 people wouldn't obey the rules."
                                                        -- Alan Bennett



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to