> From: Anton Tagunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, Leo! > > AT> Three more issues. > LSU> can we move *all* your issues to a future proposal? > LSU> I've been trying for *two weeks* to get this proposal > through, and > LSU> I'm not really up for extending it. > > Two weeks is plainly horrible. > > Still got a gut feeling ... > > with DefaultConfiguration we did > > DefaultConfiguration parent = new DefaultConfiguration( ... ); > DefaultConfiguration child = new DefaultConfiguration( "child" ); > parent.addChild( child ); > > see the catch? > > We need a *factory method* somewhere.
The MutableConfiguration interface has a getMutableChild method that works just like the getChild() method, except it will create *and add* a child node. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
