> -----Original Message----- > From: "Anton Tagunov" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > void amendConfig( final MutableConfiguration node ) > { > final DefaultConfiguration b1 = new DefaultConfiguration( "b" ); > b1.setValue( 1 ); > final DefaultConfiguration b2 = new DefaulcConfiguration( "b" ); > b2.setValue( 2 ); > node.addChild( b1 ); > node.addChild( b2 ); > } > > And I thought we would got rid of the dependency on DefaultConfiguration!
There is no dependency on DefaultConfiguration. Notice: > LSU> addChild(Configuration config) implies that you can use any Configuration implementation. J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
