I hate it when I jump into a cool thread late! :)
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 12:01, Alex Karasulu wrote: > So we can work on centralizing or generalizing this code if you guys have > a solid direction around what it is exactly you want to do. How about > starting some JIRA wishes and slowly molding the idea there. My friend > Vincent is trying to get me to do this :-) over at the directory side. +1 As I was reading the thread from the beginning I kept thinking of something like the Inteceptor classes Alex pointed out. So where do you want to do this? Here or over in the directory project? We could easily host it in our sandbox. On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 09:03, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia > > Btw fortress could be more lightweight and simple than it actually IS - just > a RANT, sorry !! ;-) I feel the same. Tell you what, start putting your suggestions in JIRA for the Fortress module and we'll work on getting a new release out ASAP. Back to the original topic of Lifecycle extensions -- I've never been completely happy with them. They seem to always be _almost_ what I need. In fact, that's the reason I added different Stage Extensions to Merlin a while back. I'd love to see the lifecycle extension mechanism generalized in Fortress to support arbitrary lifecycles. -- jaaron <http://jadetower.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
