> -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Simons > Sent: den 25 februari 2004 21:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] Automatic Versioning > > > Leo Sutic wrote: > > > [jar hell] > > There's little that can be done in such a case > > .Net pulls it off IMVHO. Aside from the default settings of visual > studio (spit), I think they pretty much figured something > workable out.
Any pointers to how they did it? > > I was thinking about > > ways to keep it from happening. > > I think any kind of versioning scheme will still not be able to > "enforce" enough rigidity, lest it become too much of a pain. I think > what is much more valuable is solid integration testing (gump!). > > > The above could be made into an Ant task. > > the algorithm is nice, and makes sense. It seems like this could be a > valuable reporting tool. But I'm a little scared because of the > "automatic"...just some thoughts ;) Yes, the tool is a reporting tool. It is up to the release manager to figure out what to do with the data. It automates the checking, but not the actual versioning. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
