Niclas Hedhman wrote:
My point; Stephen is very much of the opinion that the container should validate that the deployment requirements are fulfilled, so called rigid.
The EventDriven architecture is very much the opposite, and allow you to plug in stuff later, even to fulfill dependencies of other components that have been "starved".
I am still out on my verdict which one is preferable to err towards. One might
argue that you are "safer" with the over designed system, but I wonder if that
is really the case. I might throw together another of my essays on that subject
soon. No promises though.
Ok, I made up my mind (I had to pull on my Christian roots to do it though). For any interested parties the URL is here:
http://d-haven.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=15
Essentially, I don't like being forced into one way of doing things.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
