> I think starting with a branch is at this point useless. I'd like > us to simply talk about what it is we want. We want pluggability, > etc. I think that's something everyone will agree on. Whether we > solve it as I *think* I can via Aspects/Appliances or some other > way is still to be determined. I think I have solved two use cases, > but that's no guarantee for having solved them all.
ok > There are millions of open issues surrounding this - I think we > should focus now on having a big think about this goal - pluggabilty - > and try to scope in in our heads before we sit down and start > churning out code. We really don't need to code - we all know > all relevant language features in Java, so I'm sure we can code > anything we can come up with. Yes, we are that good. The trick > is to figure out just what we're going to code. +1 > The goal was to have an architecture that was dead simple to > explain. Therefore, any solution that can't be explained in an > email to the list sort-of disqualifies, in my opinion. +1 > Enough preaching! No no you're not we're listening. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
