On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:26, Leo Sutic wrote: > > 6. If so, what should it consist of? > > The framework spec should consist of... Avalon/Framework. > > There are holes in the framework API spec as it is now - for example, > poolable components (ECM) versus all-components-are-singletons > (Phoenix). > Those should be plugged to enable component compatibility.
Just curious, You don;t consider, for instance, * Lookup semantics, such as a Selectors and hierarchical naming, * Context entries, and * Meta-info formats and 'locations' as "semantic holes" in the current Framework? Cheers Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
