On Thursday 11 March 2004 02:55, Farr, Aaron wrote: > The > important part, as I see it, is not how the container sees the meta-info, > but how the *users* see and set the meta-info. That's what should be > consistent. I don't really care if there's a strong meta model or a simple > tool like commons-attributes to retrieve it. To me, that's a container > implementation issue. The more important aspect is a consistent pattern > the component authors can use.
Well, IMNSHO (apparent by now) you have two issue right here. The "users" can either see the contract at "source level" or "runtime level", and the former is not good enough to promote re-use. Cheers Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
