> That's probably what we'll end up doing to preserve backwards
> compatibility.
And that was my point. :-)
> Still, having one name that is the canonical one is nice.
Without it, you wouldn't have a name to which to map. :-)
> Gathering all approaches in one place is what we're doing now.
And I'm noticing things like Phoenix has the concept of an application name,
but apparently Merlin doesn't, yet.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
