On Thursday 18 March 2004 20:29, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Now, we could argue about the correct terms for months but the > term "type" is imho misleading here. If a type exposes all > features of a component why is it called a type and not > component?
Because more than one component can be of the same Type. Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
