On Thursday 18 March 2004 21:59, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Comments? > > http://mindview.net/WebLog/log-0051 > > Should be simple enough.
Interesting, but I fail to see what you are refering to. :o( I guess it is somewhat related to the conclusion that "Semantics can/should not be enforced into interfaces." And knowing your "known standpoint", I am quick to draw (perhaps incorrect) conclusions, that we shouldn't even bother to try to define a Service Type, which defines semantics beyond the interface. Just provide more flexibility to the world and we all be happy hereafter... (This has nothing to do with the Generics discussed in the article. I have not gotten a firm opinion about that - yet). If so, we live on different planets, solving different problems... It sounds to me that Avalon, even Fortress and ECM, are far too restrictive for the ultimate anarchist, who don't want to be constrained and follow guidelines that improves the daily lives of many (Hope you see the satire/sarcasm, and take it well :o) ) Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
