On Friday 19 March 2004 02:30, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Why should we event have to worry about a wrapper? Can I worry about the wrapper since it adds value? > Granted, the same type of thing can be done using attributes instead of > naming conventions. The attributes would prove more flexible as well > because they can include more information than the general "Type" that is > acceptable. That would minimize the occurance of > IllegalArgumentExceptions, etc. because the tool would then be able to > provide a control that does not allow the user to input bad information. Is this the first time two of us can agree? Wouldn't that be something to celebrate? Or are you just being sarcastic? > However, in order to tool that, the current Avalon Meta package is woefully > unequipped. Then again, I am sure there are a number of other ways to > accomplish the same goal. But, as you say, it comes down to the tools that > enable the user to do what they need. Do I think Avalon Meta in the current shape is a final solution? Have I not made it obvious that my angle is from the component towards the container, not the other way like everyone else? Why do I ask so many questions? Niclas? -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
