...... Original Message .......
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:44:35 +0200 "Andreas Oberhack" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>I don't know in which context the picture should be used. But we should
>stay in one abstraction / detail level. If you want to add persistence,
>you also should probably add things like security (subject- and
>code-level), presentation, workflow etc.

I wanted to convey the idea that both the facilities and framework 
'aspects' would be pluggable in some way.  Since this can be hard to 
describe visually I assumed I would add some text on whatever page this 
diagram would show up on.

The real point is that I would like to have a nice diagram image for our 
website -- something which would give a good big picture view of Avalon.  
When I hear about a new piece of software, one of the first things I want 
to look at is a screenshot.  So I guess I want an Avalon "screenshot."
 
>We also should have a very clear consensus, on how those services are
>plugged together.  

Yes, eventually.  But we don't need to have all that figured out just to do 
a simple diagram to help both us and our users understand where we are 
headed.
___
   jaaron

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to