I meant ComponentModel below sorry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 12:14 PM
> To: 'Avalon Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Event mechanism in Merlin
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nader Aeinehchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 5:18 PM
> > To: Avalon Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Event mechanism in Merlin
> >
> > 1. Please forgive me for my ignorance, but is the difference facility
> and
> > custom lifecycle extension?  What is a facility?
> 
> Steve explained this to me the other day.  It's a component that has
> access
> to the CompositionModel as a special Context.  So it can affect other
> components and provide services for other components.
> 
> > > To me, an event-driven component
> > > is a kissing cousin to a message-driven component, so I think a merlin
> > > plug-in facility would handle this quite nicely.
> >
> > 2. Just for clarity, we are talking about asynchronous messages among
> > various objects and components? Are not we?
> 
> I keep things synchronous with events while build SEDA stages that the
> events are enqueued on.  You can always do asynchronous from synchronous
> but
> going synchronous from asynchronous is harder.  I'd keep it simple and
> synchronous.
> 
> > 3. In Jini, there is Distributed Events.  Is this something that should
> be
> > taken into consideration to handle events among various JVMs?
> 
> Maybe but I have not thought that far yet.  I'm just using this for
> decoupling components so I can avoid cyclic dependencies.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to