On Sunday 11 April 2004 14:40, Leif Mortenson wrote: > If the various > containers are not going to be forward compatible then it kind of > trashes the whole > reason for having a "standard" API like framework.
The interesting aspect of your assessment is that, "If the components doesn't work everywhere without change, we have failed our mission." As soon as there were more than one container, Avalon failed in the "future compatible" department and our struggles over the last year has been centered around this fact. Technical solutions for 'running Fortress components' are probably less hard nut to crack than getting everyone's mind set on 'where is the road forward?'. Cheers Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
