On Thursday 20 May 2004 23:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > So the official directory layout for Avalon is: > You realize that this is bad, right?
> Does this make sense to you now? I understand what you are saying, but I think I disagree to a large degree. AFAIUI, the 'ttb' notion is a construct by individuals, not native to subversion itself, but that is irrelevant to the discussion now. I want a unified tree, without any 'ttb's all over the place, and without splitting into separate checkouts. The unified tree is IMNSHO very important!! It has also been said that tags and branches are virtually free of charge, and I am leveraging on this fact. Which would mean, I copy the whole tree - so what - sue me - it is free of charge. Furthermore, I can do; svn cp trunk/avalon/runtime/framework branches/niclas/af5 if I like to, and then merge back where it was spawned from. Once my branches are old, and perhaps crashed experiments, I delete them out of view... As for Releases; Assuming we keep the current model (which is a completely different debate in itself, more about that in the coming weeks), I don't see that you need to put the version number at the immediate level below "releases", but could put artifact first, such as avalon/framework/4.3/ or in a few other ways... I did spend some thought on this :o) and weighed one thing against another. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
