On Sunday 20 June 2004 05:36, J Aaron Farr wrote: > Using the GPL or LGPL for images (and even documentation) is a really > odd way of doing things, so the implications are not clear. Most likely > it means that we have to supply the SVG source (not a problem) and if we > make any changes to the SVG images, then those changes are under the > LGPL.
I agree that this is somewhat odd. But I also recognize decrees about "No (L)GPL on ASF infrastructure", from the legal guys. Ok, so let's see what the response from legal is... Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
