> -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:55 PM > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] End the drama > > > I don't view either the Components or the Framework as legacy > > Neither do I. And Stephen's reply was similar to yours. > None of us think that the word "legacy" is a good choice. > > OK, other than the use of the term "legacy" (yeah, like > that's the first time a word has been poorly chosen ;-)), > what other issues do you have with the proposal that Peter, > Aaron and Stefano are discussing?
As I stated in a response to Peter, I just have an aversion to marketing-driven version bumps. Is there amicable solution that doesn't require such a re-branding? > > > How about giving the team some time to produce alternative views of > > the site to see if we can come to some agreement and consensus. > > Is your view of the "team" broad enough to realize that Peter > is part of it? > Absolutely. Have I come across in any way that I disregard Peter's input? He is part of the PMC and thus has an equal voice. I apologize if I somehow came across that way. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]