On Monday 02 August 2004 21:51, Leo Simons wrote: > I think this is just about the optimal way to do it (not that I need it, > but it sounds like it doesn't impact me at all either :-D).
I hoped so :o) > One tidbit: > wouldn't call it "XXXAware", as the "Aware" suffix is used in webwork 2 > and other places now as a form of setter dependency injection. Would be > confusing. Didn't know this... > Perhaps "AvailabilitySupport"? Support is very wide :o( , and I typically see it in the JavaBeans styled apps as a delegation pattern. Perhaps, AvailabilityCapable ?? Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
