[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900538#action_12900538
]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-590:
-----------------------------------
The last proposal above seems best, to permit one to specify arbitrary
properties for both the field and for it's type. However I think I'd reverse
the order, so that properties near to the type would be for the type and
properties near the field name would be for the field. So the above example
might become:
{code}
@java-class("java.math.BigInteger") int foo @order("decreasing");
{code}
> IDL: order specifications don't work
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-590
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: java
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Assignee: Doug Cutting
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> The IDL compiler has a mechanism for specifying field ordering, but it
> doesn't work.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
