[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966282#action_12966282
]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-703:
-----------------------------------
Looks good. Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP? I'd expect we
might see a significant difference with one-way messages.
To test this we might:
. extend Python's tool.py to use socket client & server when uri is "avro:"
. extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for "avro:" uris
. change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these
"avro:" uris
> socket transport for Python
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-703
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: python
> Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Reporter: Eric Evans
> Assignee: Eric Evans
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch
>
>
> Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to
> follow.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
