[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Douglas Creager updated AVRO-766:
---------------------------------
Attachment: ref-cycle.c
Here's a minimal test case that shows the memory leak.
{noformat}
$ gcc -o ref-cycle ref-cycle.c -lavro
$ valgrind --leak-check=full ./ref-cycle
[SNIP]
==48091== 2,782 (48 direct, 2,734 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 19 of 19
==48091== at 0x1000121DE: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==48091== by 0x100030BC3: avro_schema_record (in
/usr/local/Cellar/avro-c/HEAD/lib/libavro.1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.dylib)
==48091== by 0x100031CCE: avro_schema_from_json_t (in
/usr/local/Cellar/avro-c/HEAD/lib/libavro.1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.dylib)
==48091== by 0x10003234D: avro_schema_from_json (in
/usr/local/Cellar/avro-c/HEAD/lib/libavro.1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.dylib)
==48091== by 0x100000E4D: main (in ./ref-cycle)
{noformat}
> C: Memory leak from reference count cycles
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-766
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-766
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: c
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Douglas Creager
> Attachments: ref-cycle.c
>
>
> If you parse a recursive Avro schema, you end up with a cycle in the
> reference graph for the avro_schema_t objects that are created. The
> reference counting mechanism that we're using can't detect this, and so you
> get a memory leak.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira