[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Micah Huff updated AVRO-1316:
-----------------------------

               Labels: patch  (was: )
    Affects Version/s: 1.7.5
         Release Note: Correct java compilation error when schema is too large 
to be stored in a single String constant
               Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

Instead of a single string constant, we split the String up into 65K chunks as 
a variable 'partX'. There is a new parse method for both Protocol and Schema 
that now accepts an array of string variables (e.g. parse(new String[] { part1, 
part2 })); If the protocol is not large enough to encounter this issue, the 
output of the generated java files does not change.
                
> IDL code-generation generates too-long literals for very large schemas
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1316
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1316
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.5
>            Reporter: Jeremy Kahn
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: patch
>         Attachments: AVRO-1316.patch
>
>
> When I work from a very large IDL schema, the Java code generated includes a 
> schema JSON literal that exceeds the length of the maximum allowed literal 
> string ([65535 
> characters|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8323082/size-of-initialisation-string-in-java]).
>   
> This creates weird Maven errors like: {{[ERROR] ...FooProtocol.java:[13,89] 
> constant string too long}}.
> It might seem a little crazy, but a 64-kilobyte JSON protocol isn't 
> outrageous at all for some of the more involved data structures, especially 
> if we're including documentation strings etc.
> I believe the fix should be a bit more sensitivity to the length of the JSON 
> literal (and a willingness to split it into more than one literal, joined by 
> {{+}}), but I haven't figured out where that change needs to go. Has anyone 
> else encountered this problem?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to