Hello,

According to Avro Standard 1.7.5 enums match when names match and all writer 
symbols exist in reader schema.

According to this definition the following writer schema:
  { "type": "enum", "name":"Suit","symbols":["SPADES", "HEARTS", "DIAMONDS", 
"CLUBS"]}
matches this reader schema:
  { "type": "enum", "name":"Suit","symbols":["HEARTS", "SPADES", "DIAMONDS", 
"CLUBS"]}

However this can lead to semantical problems. Assume I have the following datum:
  Suit suit = SPADES

According to writer schema a zero will be encoded. However when deserialized 
using the aforementioned reader schema the datum will correspond to HEARTS 
since the order of symbols has changed in the reader schema and HEARTS is the 
first.

My question is, why the standard doesn't explicitly add another constraint for 
matching enums like the order of elements must be preserved, or is it implied?

Best regards,
Youssef Hatem

Reply via email to