[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Niels Basjes updated AVRO-1614:
-------------------------------
    Attachment: AVRO-1614-20141204-v4.patch

- Added new test idl to seekout colissions (builder, Builder, etc.).
- Fixed (existing) bug that came to light when using the record name "Builder".
- Reduced the number of whitespace changes as much as possible.

> Always getting a value...
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1614
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1614
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: java
>            Reporter: Niels Basjes
>              Labels: java
>         Attachments: AVRO-1614-20141027-v1.patch, 
> AVRO-1614-20141201-v2.patch, AVRO-1614-20141202-v3.patch, 
> AVRO-1614-20141204-v4.patch
>
>
> Sometimes the Avro structure becomes deeply nested.
> If in such a scenario you want to be able to set a specific value deep in 
> this tree you want to do this:
> {code}
> public void setSomething(String value) {
>     myStruct
>             .getFoo()
>             .getBar()
>             .getOne()
>             .getOther()
>             .setSomething(value);
> }
> {code}
> The 'problem' I ran into is that any of the 4 get methods can return a null 
> value so the code I have to write is really huge.
> For every step in this method I have to build null checks and create the 
> underlying instance if it is null.
> I already started writing helper methods to do this for parts of my tree.
> To solve this in a way that makes this code readable I came up with the 
> following which I want to propose to you guys (before I start working on a 
> patch).
> My idea is to generate a new 'get' method in addition to the existing normal 
> get method for the regular instance of the class.
> So in addition to the 
> {code}
> public Foo getFoo() {
>     return foo;
> }
> {code}
> I propose to generate something like this as well in the cases where this is 
> a type of structure that you may want to traverse as shown in the example.
> {code}
> public Foo getAlwaysFoo() {
>     if (foo == null) {
>         setFoo(Foo.newBuilder().build());
>     }
>     return foo;
> }
> {code}
> This way the automatically created instance immediately has all the defaults 
> I have defined.
> Assuming this naming my code will be readable because it will look like this:
> {code}
> public void setSomething(String value) {
>     myStruct
>             .getAlwaysFoo()
>             .getAlwaysBar()
>             .getAlwaysOne()
>             .getAlwaysOther()
>             .setSomething(value);
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to