[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dmitry Spikhalskiy updated AVRO-1743:
-------------------------------------
    Description: 
BlockingBinaryEncoder, which extends BufferedBinaryEncoder should override 
"public void writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) throws IOException" method.
Now if we use BlockingBinaryEncoder - all writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) are 
addressed by BufferedBinaryEncoder. As a result, if  "!bytes.hasArray() && 
bytes.remaining() > bulkLimit", then in flushBuffer() we flush empty buffer 
from BufferedBinaryEncoder and don't flush actual buffer from 
BlockingBinaryEncoder.

I prepared localized unit tests to replicate bugs here: 
https://github.com/Spikhalskiy/avro-blockingbinaryencoder-error

Looks like BlockingBinaryEncoder which extended BufferedBinaryEncoder is error 
prone approach and problem in hierarchy. We mostly override everything from 
BufferedBinaryEncoder, creating unused buffers and fields (like double pos, 
buf, etc), and it's already not first bug relating to "somebody forget to 
override method in BlockingBinaryEncoder from BufferedBinaryEncoder" (ex. 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-88). So, this classed should be 
separated at all or have common interface, or at least works with same buffer 
and pos values. But BlockingBinaryEncoder shouldn't inherit method 
implementations, which work with another buffer object


  was:
BlockingBinaryEncoder, which extends BufferedBinaryEncoder should override 
"public void writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) throws IOException" method.
Now if we are using BlockingBinaryEncoder - all writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) 
are addressed by BufferedBinaryEncoder. As a result, if  "!bytes.hasArray() && 
bytes.remaining() > bulkLimit", then in flushBuffer() we flush empty buffer 
from BufferedBinaryEncoder and don't flush actual buffer from 
BlockingBinaryEncoder.

I prepared localized unit tests to replicate bugs here: 
https://github.com/Spikhalskiy/avro-blockingbinaryencoder-error

Looks like BlockingBinaryEncoder which extended BufferedBinaryEncoder is error 
prone approach and problem in hierarchy. We mostly override everything from 
BufferedBinaryEncoder, creating unused buffers and fields (like double pos, 
buf, etc), and it's already not first bug relating to "somebody forget to 
override method in BlockingBinaryEncoder from BufferedBinaryEncoder" (ex. 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-88). So, this classed should be 
separated at all or have common interface, or at least works with same buffer 
and pos values. But BlockingBinaryEncoder shouldn't inherit method 
implementations, which work with another buffer object



> BlockingBinaryEncoder should override writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1743
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.7
>         Environment: All environments
>            Reporter: Dmitry Spikhalskiy
>
> BlockingBinaryEncoder, which extends BufferedBinaryEncoder should override 
> "public void writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) throws IOException" method.
> Now if we use BlockingBinaryEncoder - all writeFixed(ByteBuffer bytes) are 
> addressed by BufferedBinaryEncoder. As a result, if  "!bytes.hasArray() && 
> bytes.remaining() > bulkLimit", then in flushBuffer() we flush empty buffer 
> from BufferedBinaryEncoder and don't flush actual buffer from 
> BlockingBinaryEncoder.
> I prepared localized unit tests to replicate bugs here: 
> https://github.com/Spikhalskiy/avro-blockingbinaryencoder-error
> Looks like BlockingBinaryEncoder which extended BufferedBinaryEncoder is 
> error prone approach and problem in hierarchy. We mostly override everything 
> from BufferedBinaryEncoder, creating unused buffers and fields (like double 
> pos, buf, etc), and it's already not first bug relating to "somebody forget 
> to override method in BlockingBinaryEncoder from BufferedBinaryEncoder" (ex. 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-88). So, this classed should be 
> separated at all or have common interface, or at least works with same buffer 
> and pos values. But BlockingBinaryEncoder shouldn't inherit method 
> implementations, which work with another buffer object



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to