[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15369631#comment-15369631
 ] 

Yibing Shi commented on AVRO-1877:
----------------------------------

{quote}
The way you call javaType from javaUnbox in this latest patch is not correct. 
For example, if you have a {{union \{null, double\}}}, javaType() will turn it 
into a boxed java.lang.Double that is nullable. Your changes to javaUnbox will 
then incorrectly convert that to a primitive type double. My suggestion is to 
revert to the old code and maybe refactor the duplicate SPECIFIC conversion 
part into a separate method.
{quote}
Very good point! I will correct this. Thanks for the idea!

{quote}
The problem is that enableDecimalLogicalType only applies to the Decimal 
logical type. For the other logical types, such as date or timestamp-millis, 
they would be converted even if you didn't enableDecimalLogicalType. 
{quote}
This is done on purpose. It is to keep backwards compatibility with 1.8.0. When 
date/time logical types were added in 1.8.0, they always use logical types 
instead of backing raw types in SpecificRecord. Please see [this 
comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1847?focusedCommentId=15327757&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15327757]
 for more details.

> AVRO-1847 accidentally breaks javaUnbox method in SpecificCompiler
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1877
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Yibing Shi
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: AVRO-1877.1.patch
>
>
> AVRO-1847 accidentally removes the logical type conversion logic in method 
> {{SpecificCompiler.javaUnbox}}, which breaks the data time type compiling in 
> specific compiler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to