[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15676018#comment-15676018
]
konstantin edited comment on AVRO-1903 at 11/18/16 7:59 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Frederic,
I see little value in adding this complexity (along with possible bugs and
issues) to Avro.
* Java 9 will allow you to alias imports.
* Schema's should be agnostic to language details
Regarding the patch/implementation detail, I have concerns:
* Relies on both class's generated by specific maven plugin, some people use
some alternative generation in other build tools such as sbt, as well as the
runtime Avro version.
* What occurs where I have a shared generated Java bundle, yet some users are
on a previous Avro 1.8.x runtime version (mainly due to other third class
libraries, depending on them, Storm, Spark, general Hadoop eco-sphere)
* Files written in Java on Avro 1.8.x (We have 1.5 PB of these on our Hadoop
cluster) or before will not contain in their datum files the schema that has
this "magic" mapping/binding as such will cause a ClassNotFound if using
1.8.new with mapping/bindings
* What occurs with compatibility with c clients, where they will write Avro
files without this special Java field.
* Does this work with other languages such as Scala, Clojure that generally
build/reuse Java implementations?
* There is no testing.
Also it be great to have a discussion thread on this.
was (Author: k.burstev):
Hey Frederic,
I see little value in adding this complexity (along with possible bugs and
issues) to Avro.
* Java 9 will allow you to alias imports.
* Schema's should be agnostic to language details
Regarding the patch/implementation detail, I have concerns:
* Relies on both class's generated by specific maven plugin, some people use
some alternative generation in other build tools such as sbt, as well as the
runtime Avro version.
* What occurs where I have a shared generated Java bundle, yet some users are
on a previous Avro 1.8.x runtime version (mainly due to other third class
libraries, depending on them, Storm, Spark, general Hadoop eco-sphere)
* Files written in Java on Avro 1.8.x (We have 1.5 PB of these on our Hadoop
cluster) or before will not contain in their datum files the schema that has
this "magic" mapping/binding as such will cause a ClassNotFound if using
1.8.new with mapping/bindings
* What occurs with compatibility with c clients, where they will write Avro
files without this special Java field. (and nor should they care this is the
point of schema's being language agnostic )
* Does this work with other languages such as Scala, Clojure that generally
build/reuse Java implementations?
* There is no testing.
Also it be great to have a discussion thread on this.
> Java package/class bindings for specific records
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-1903
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1903
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: java
> Affects Versions: 1.8.1
> Reporter: Frederic Boucher
> Attachments: AVRO-1903.patch
>
>
> Naming convention of the Avro schemas we create are not always in line with
> the Java coding convention. The maven-plugin to generate specific record
> classes should provide a way to bind namespace or schema names to a custom
> Java package or class name.
> We have implemented a solution where we can add bindings into the
> maven-plugin configuration:
> One to one binding:
> <binding>
> <from>com.namspace.order.state</from>
> <to>com.package.Order</to>
> </binding>
> It will create a class "Order" into package "com.package" for schema "state"
> and namespace "com.namspace.order"
> Reg-exp based binding:
> <binding>
> <from>com.namespace.order.([a-zA-Z]+)</from>
> <to>com.package.order.Order$1</to>
> </binding>
> Bindings are matched in order, which means the most specific bindings have to
> be put before the generic ones.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
