1) Yes I agree on using the GitHub for code review. 2) And if we wish to actively encourage it, we would need to update our contribution wiki. 3) Also, I dont want to stop people from submitting patches, so for the time being I would say lets keep both running. 4) I would say, lets continue to use JIRA. We have significant history present here. Moving to issues might need to fine-tune the workflow out there.
S -Suraj Acharya On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called > 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make > use of whichever github features they want. > > Personally, I find PR management via the github interface way faster > than other options. In particular, since it has a usable mobile > interface I'm able to use commute time to do reviews via it. > > What do folks think about > > 1) opting in generally > > 2) using github PRs directly > > 3) actively encouraging our community to switch to github PRs > > 4) using github issues > > > [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > -- > busbey >
