On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Bridger Howell <[email protected]> wrote:
> But then would I end up with a few bits of ugliness: > - the schemas have to be wrapped in a made-up protocol > - the generated code includes a generated protocol class I wouldn't care > about > Wouldn't these be eliminated if we simply permitted 'record', 'enum', 'union' and 'fixed' as top-level items in the IDL syntax? That would not be a difficult change. Doug
