[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312388#comment-16312388
]
Victor Mota commented on AVRO-1335:
-----------------------------------
Hi, please take a look at https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/241. I've made
many changes since your original comments and fixed several other issues that
came up after heavy usage for several months by our users at Google BigQuery.
We'd love to have this merged in so others can benefit and to make other bug
fixes/features we've added to the library easier to merge in subsequent PRs.
> C++ should support field default values
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-1335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1335
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: c++
> Affects Versions: 1.7.4
> Reporter: Bin Guo
> Attachments: AVRO-1335.patch
>
>
> We found that resolvingDecoder could not provide bidirectional compatibility
> between different version of schemas.
> Especially for records, for example:
> {code:title=First schema}
> {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "TestRecord",
> "fields": [
> {
> "name": "MyData",
> "type": {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "SubData",
> "fields": [
> {
> "name": "Version1",
> "type": "string"
> }
> ]
> }
> },
> {
> "name": "OtherData",
> "type": "string"
> }
> ]
> }
> {code}
> {code:title=Second schema}
> {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "TestRecord",
> "fields": [
> {
> "name": "MyData",
> "type": {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "SubData",
> "fields": [
> {
> "name": "Version1",
> "type": "string"
> },
> {
> "name": "Version2",
> "type": "string"
> }
> ]
> }
> },
> {
> "name": "OtherData",
> "type": "string"
> }
> ]
> }
> {code}
> Say, node A knows only the first schema and node B knows the second schema,
> and the second schema has more fields.
> Any data generated by node B can be resolved by first schema 'cause the
> additional field is marked as skipped.
> But data generated by node A can not be resolved by second schema and throws
> an exception *"Don't know how to handle excess fields for reader."*
> This is because data is resolved exactly according to the auto-generated
> codec_traits which trying to read the excess field.
> The problem is we just can not only ignore the excess field in record, since
> the data after the troublesome record also needs to be resolved.
> Actually this problem stucked us for a very long time.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
