Laurent Stacul created AVRO-2572:
------------------------------------

             Summary: [avrocpp] Too restrictive SONAME
                 Key: AVRO-2572
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2572
             Project: Apache Avro
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: c++
    Affects Versions: 1.9.1, 1.8.2, 1.9.0, 1.8.1
            Reporter: Laurent Stacul
             Fix For: 1.9.2


Hello,

While I was upgrading Apache Avro from 1.8.2 to 1.9.1, I checked the binary 
compatibility using RedHat libabigail. If the code was OK which is what I 
expected from the Semantic Versioning of the project, I did not expect that the 
binary compatibility check failed due to the soname.

I checked and found out this point was raised for the C component and fixed 
there: [https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/239.]

If the binary compatibility is respected across the major versions of 
libavrocpp, I would expect
{code:java}
SONAME Library soname: [libavrocpp.so.1]{code}
instead of:
{code:java}
SONAME Library soname: [libavrocpp.so.1.10.0-SNAPSHOT.0]{code}
Do you agree on this ?

Regards,

Laurent



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to