[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17466951#comment-17466951
]
Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind commented on AVRO-3276:
------------------------------------------------------
Good idea. How is the adjustment in the PR for AVRO-3275?
> Spec wording on fullnames is not clear
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-3276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3276
> Project: Apache Avro
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: spec
> Reporter: Askar Safin
> Priority: Major
>
> Consider this Avro scheme:
> {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "a.b",
> "fields": [
> {
> "name": "c",
> "type": {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "d",
> "fields": []
> }
> }
> ]
> }
> What is fullname of record "d"? "a.d" or "d"? I think Avro specification is
> vague about this and should be fixed. When I attempt to interpret Avro spec
> literally, I get to conclusion that the fullname is "a.d". But this
> contradicts to my common sense.
>
> I asked on mailing list and got answer "a.d" (
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread/n0fjyv7c84zq21s9rwhffcxts72rmzq4] ). I still
> think spec should be fixed
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
