[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3527?focusedWorklogId=779188&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-779188
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AVRO-3527:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/Jun/22 16:54
            Start Date: 07/Jun/22 16:54
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: RyanSkraba commented on PR #1708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/1708#issuecomment-1148926792

   Thanks for the PR, this looks really interesting!  I set the target for 
1.12.0 because it's a change in how classes are generated... but I'm curious 
whether that should really be the case.  I really don't think there's any 
reason this could be a major change!  What do you think?




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 779188)
    Time Spent: 50m  (was: 40m)

> Generated equals() and hashCode() for SpecificRecords
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-3527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3527
>             Project: Apache Avro
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: java
>            Reporter: Steven Aerts
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>         Attachments: equals_hashcode_after.txt, equals_hashcode_before.txt, 
> flame_graph.jpeg
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When profiling our production system, we found that it was spending almost 
> 40% of its overall time in the {{SpecificRecordBase.hashCode()}} and 
> {{SpecificRecordBase.equals()}} implementations.
> In some sections of its logic we see that almost all time is spend in those 
> function, as can be seen in attached flame graph  (blue "pyramids")
> !flame_graph.jpeg|width=385,height=99!
> By generating the {{.equals()}} and {{.hashCode()}} all this overhead 
> disappeared and this application became 35% faster overall. 
> Also on other AVRO heavy applications we saw noticeable performance gains 
> where we hadn't expect them due to this improvement.
> A generated implementation of {{.hashCode()}} becomes 5 to 10 times faster 
> than its generic counterpart. For {{.equals()}} it is 10 to 20 times faster.
> Which is also visible in the attached JMH benchmarks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to