+1 for separating out the releases and starting a vote on just that. We can
debate the other details as we go.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 12:25 PM Tim Perkins <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:15 PM Ryan Skraba <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe a good way to get to consensus would be to list the possible
> > actions we could take, and prioritize them?
> >
>
> One of the actions that I would like to see is the compilation of which
> parts of the spec each language implements. This would be a useful addition
> to the documentation.
>
> If we compile this table it may be that it requires a lot of footnotes and
> qualifications for differences in how languages implement the spec, but
> overall it would still be useful to identify gaps, highlight differences,
> and perhaps ultimately drive more compatibility.
>


-- 
Ryan Blue
Tabular

Reply via email to