Hi folks,

I updated the PR (https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/2855) to fully
build with Java 11 min.

Do we have a consensus to bump directly to Java 17 ? If so, I will
update the PR accordingly, using Java 17 by default and adding Java 22
in the test scope.

Regards
JB

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Fokko
>
> I'm happy to bump directly to Java 17 if everyone is OK with that.
> I can update the Jira ticket and the PR accordingly.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 4:22 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey JB,
> >
> > Thanks for taking the lead here. Let me know if there is anything I can
> > help with.
> >
> > With regards to the Java version bump, I'm open to going to JDK17 directly.
> > This is also the case for Spark 4 as well:
> > https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.5.1/building-spark.html#apache-maven
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Fokko
> >
> > Op di 16 apr 2024 om 15:56 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > follow up on this discussion, I created
> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/2855
> > >
> > > I'm working on some new PRs heading to the releases :)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:55 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 11:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > (finally I received the email from the list cleanly, w00t ;))
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for pointing the previous discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think 1.12.0 is OK as it's mostly the Java part that gonna be
> > > > > impacted. I think 2.0.0 would make more sense for a spec change
> > > > > impacting all languages.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, I'm proposing:
> > > > > - Avro 1.12.0 with Java 11 by default in Java
> > > > > - Avro 1.11.4 still on Java 8.
> > > > > It makes sense to maintain both to give users the time to update (and
> > > > > encourage them to do so :)).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 9:54 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There were few discussions about this some months ago, e.g.
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bd39zhk655pgzfctq763vp3z4xrjpx58
> > > > > > I think everyone agreed that 1.12.0 could be bumped to Java 11+!
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8d7cjywz6mpj81bhbx5tz6flbvwzsdk -
> > > here
> > > > > > Niels even suggested to bump the version to 2.0.0, but since Avro is
> > > > > > multi-language repo I don't think changing the version to 2.x for 
> > > > > > all
> > > > > langs
> > > > > > makes sense.
> > > > > > Users of Java 8 will have to stay with 1.11.x. There was another
> > > > > discussion
> > > > > > at dev@ about maintaining both branches for some time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:11 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NB: I'm sending this email with my regular email address ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm doing a full pass to prepare Avro 1.11.4 and 1.12.0 releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have a question for you: on the main branch (e.g. 1.12.0), I
> > > propose
> > > > > > > to update the Java source/release target version to 11 (instead of
> > > > > > > 1.8). I'm testing it right now, and so far so good.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm also preparing some updates and cleanup. I will open the PRs
> > > today.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >

Reply via email to