The document seems to imply that all source will live in the same repository. Is that the goal?
My preference would be to have separate extensions live in separate repos; that way, they can have their different release cycles that might align better with the systems they're actually dependent on (e.g. a Kafka extension releasing right after a new major Kafka version). And one extension being unstable doesn't affect development for other extensions. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > I have drafted a very basic guideline for contributing new extensions for > Apache Bahir. My main goal is to use that as the start point to a community > discussion that can flush out some details and make the process for > proposing, accepting and retiring a extension very transparent. > > Please review the initial draft at : > http://bahir.apache.org/contributing-extensions/ > > And let's use this thread for any question, comments, feedback, etc. > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
