I agree with importing just the source .... Regards Mridul
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < [email protected]> wrote: > I think source is fine by me for the first import - is there > a specific reason to have all the artifacts? > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: [email protected] <javascript:;> > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/31/16, 5:42 PM, "Luciano Resende" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >I was thinking about how to import the initial extensions from spark and > >had some initial thoughts : > > > >- Import history as much as possible > >- Create a folder structure where all artifacts for a given extension > would > >be in that folder, including source, example, doc, etc > > > >Thoughts ? > > > >Any suggestions for the folder structure ? > > > >-- > >Luciano Resende > >http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
