+1 for independent versioning. The API for connectors in Flink is pretty stable, so there should be little confusion about what Bahir connector version works with what Flink version.
Stephan On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > +1 to using "major.minor" format. > > Regards > JB > > > On 08/25/2016 02:31 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering how we want to version the modules in the "bahir-flink" >> repository. >> >> I would actually like to do the versions independent of Flink. One of the >> motivations to move the connectors to Bahir was to allow faster releases. >> >> How about just "major.minor" versions, starting from 1.0. Bugfix releases >> would be 1.1, 1.2, and so on. >> I would also prefer to do frequent major releases (for example when a new >> connector is added) and do bugfix releases only if needed. >> >> Also, there's the ActiveMQ connector PR pending, and a HBase streaming >> connector incoming. Once they are both merged, I'd like to create the >> first >> Bahir-flink release to get the whole infrastructure in place. >> >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Regards, >> Robert >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
