Thanks Christian !

+1 for release.


Regards,
Mridul


On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Christian Kadner <ckad...@apache.org> wrote:
> Good catch. We appear to be missing to run the mvn `release:clean`
> target after `release:prepare`. We should fix that for the next release.
> All prior Apache Bahir source distributions contained these release
> build artifacts.
>
> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 to track it.
>
> Thanks, Christian
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> From:     Mridul Muralidharan <mri...com>
>> To:       dev@bahir.apache.org
>> Date:     02/07/2017 10:53 AM
>> Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.1.0 (RC1)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> The tests pass, and the signatures check out.
>>
>> I noticed that there are a few 'releaseBackup' files and
>> 'release.properties' in the 'source distribution' which are not from
>> our repo (probably some artifact of the build process ?).
>> I am +1 assuming this is not an issue : have not noticed (or probably
>> checked) this in earlier releases.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Christian Kadner <ck...he.org> wrote:
>> > Dear community member,
>> >
>> > please vote to approve the release of Apache Bahir 2.1.0 (RC1) based on
>> > Apache Spark 2.1.0.
>> >
>> > Changes:
>> >
>> >   https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.2-rc3...v2.1.0-rc1
>> >
>> > Tag: v2.1.0-rc1 (e61cc3d)
>> >
>> >   https://github.com/apache/bahir/tree/v2.1.0-rc1
>> >
>> > Release files:
>> >
>> >   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1012
>> >
>> > Source distribution:
>> >
>> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.1.0-rc1/
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
>> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> >
>> >   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.1.0
>> >   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for you vote!
>>
>>

Reply via email to